|
Videofluoroscopy is a clinical evaluation method that is used in most
clinics on a regular basis for diagnosis of problems with voice production
or swallowing after total laryngectomy. Van As et al (2001) describe a
standardized protocol for the assessment of these recordings. This protocol
not only consists of visual assessments but also contains objective quantitative
measures of the neoglottis. Their study also investigated the relation
between the evaluation of the videofluoroscopy recordings in relations
to perceptual evaluation, acoustic analyses, and maximum phonation time,
in order to reveal which aspects are important to judge in relation to
voice quality.
As a result of these studies, a set of parameters has been
selected that are relevant to assess in videofluoroscopy recordings. These
parameters are: visual assessment of the presence of a neoglottic bar
(yes/no), regurgitation of barium during phonation (yes/no), tonicity
of the neoglottis during phonation (hypotonic, normotonic, hypertonic,
spasm, stricture) and quantitative measures in mm (in digitalized images
of rest and phonation) of the minimal neoglottic distance at rest and
during phonation, the surface area of the neoglottic bar at rest and during
phonation, the prominence of the neoglottic bar at rest and during phonation,
and the increase of the maximal sub-neoglottal distance from rest to phonation.
To the right are two examples of videofluorscopic images
(a case of hypertrophy at the top and a case of hypotrophy below; by clicking
on the links below the images the accompanying /aa/ sound can be heard).
Each image shows the situation at rest on the left side and the situation
during voicing on the right. Note that during voicing in the hypertrophic
case the subneoglottic area is widely extended, whereas in the hypotonic
case no contact can be seen between the neoglottic bar and the anterior
pharyngeal wall. |

Play sound-file

Play sound-file |